On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 11:09 +0100, Valent Turkovic wrote: > Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 08:26 +0100, Valent Turkovic wrote: > >> Andrew Farris wrote: > >>> Valent Turkovic wrote: > >>> > >>>> And I bet that more will choose ubuntu as a "friendlier" desktop if > >>>> fedora forces people to use SELinux. > >>> Except noone is talking about forcing anyone to use selinux, just about > >>> not 'suggesting' that they don't use it... which is exactly what turning > >>> it off at install would be doing. > >>> > >> Sorry but you are forcing it if is enabled by default on install. > >> How much users (not counting devels, admins and testers) of fedora know > >> about SELinux and what it is? And what do people do when they install > >> something - they probably leave all settings on default in hope that > >> they don't "break" something with their wrong choices. > > > > I would like to propose that the CD Desktop spin also always run as > > root. > > Users do not know how to correctly use file permissions (or even know > > what they are) and they often are annoyed that they cannot simply remove > > useless directories like /usr that serve no apparent purpose but occupy > > a lot of space. > > > > Ah, also, can we run Fedora on a FAT file system by default, it's a much > > easier file system to deal with and works on Cameras too and it is not > > case sensitive, which is really helpful, case sensitivity is sooo > > annoying ... > > > > And also those annoying pop-ups asking for the root of a password when > > you want to change some configuration? What in the earth is the root of > > a password? I'd say login as root with no password is the best for > > usability, > > > > please consider it! > > > > </SCNR> > > > > Where is your bugzilla RFE? Don't say you didn't post it to bugzilla :) > > I believe that all your most of your concerns can be dealth through > policykit so please put RFE to correct package. I think you missed the smell of sarcasm on Simo's breath. -- Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
