On 13/01/2008, Naheem Zaffar <naheemzaffar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I would expect different services to also cause some performance > penalties. I doubt OpenSUSE uses SElinux for one. This is a selling > point for Fedora. > This thread makes for interesting reading on the overhead of SElinux: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/6/14 Even with that patch, SElinux seems to incur a 25% overhead on simple file open/close. Not sure if that's since been adressed, or if I am misinterpretting the data given. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
