On Jan 13, 2008 6:13 PM, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 13/01/2008, Naheem Zaffar <naheemzaffar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I would expect different services to also cause some performance > > penalties. I doubt OpenSUSE uses SElinux for one. This is a selling > > point for Fedora. > > > > This thread makes for interesting reading on the overhead of SElinux: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/6/14 > > Even with that patch, SElinux seems to incur a 25% overhead on simple > file open/close. Not sure if that's since been adressed, or if I am > misinterpretting the data given. This is about a patch that fixes this issue and the patch is already merged. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
