On 13/01/2008, Naheem Zaffar <naheemzaffar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would expect different services to also cause some performance
> penalties. I doubt OpenSUSE uses SElinux for one. This is a selling
> point for Fedora.
>
This thread makes for interesting reading on the overhead of SElinux:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/6/14
Even with that patch, SElinux seems to incur a 25% overhead on simple
file open/close. Not sure if that's since been adressed, or if I am
misinterpretting the data given.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
I have SELinux disabled because of many problems.
--
Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek
http://liviopl.jogger.pl/
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
