On 12/18/2007 02:32 PM, Lubomir Kundrak wrote: > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 13:14 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: >> On 12/18/2007 01:09 PM, Lubomir Kundrak wrote: >>> Oliver, >>> >>> On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:42 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426024 >>>> >>>> This is the second sa_restorer bug I filed. However. >>>> >>>> I can only ask all of you to check if your pkgs do use signal.h and if, >>>> check if they do use sa_restorer. >>>> >>>> Maybe someone volunteers to do a grep over all sources!? And list the >>>> pkgs here!? Someone already did a similar job after the introduction of >>>> FORITIFY_SOURCE=2 with glibc's open check... I would do so myself, but I >>>> don't have the ressources at the moment... >>> I have complete rawhide source tree from 2007-11-14 exploded lying >>> around. I'll assume it's recent enough and will post the results of the >>> grep, but it takes some time as it's on a compressed filesystem. >> Great Lubomir! Thx. I'm looking forward to see the results. > > Here you are [1]. Just raw grep results, I hope it will help you find > out where to look for sa_restorer occurences. > > [1] http://skosi.org/~lkundrak/misc/sa_restorer Well. There are some in kernel - I don't want to touch that :-) However, there are some that are already commented out - but some are still serious. I'll take a closer look on that in the next days and see how we can do an easy join of the pkg names + maintainer mail :-) -of -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
