Re: Yet another sa_restorer bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/18/2007 01:09 PM, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> Oliver,
> 
> On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:42 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426024
>>
>> This is the second sa_restorer bug I filed. However.
>>
>> I can only ask all of you to check if your pkgs do use signal.h and if,
>> check if they do use sa_restorer.
>>
>> Maybe someone volunteers to do a grep over all sources!? And list the
>> pkgs here!? Someone already did a similar job after the introduction of
>> FORITIFY_SOURCE=2 with glibc's open check... I would do so myself, but I
>> don't have the ressources at the moment...
> 
> I have complete rawhide source tree from 2007-11-14 exploded lying
> around. I'll assume it's recent enough and will post the results of the
> grep, but it takes some time as it's on a compressed filesystem.

Great Lubomir! Thx. I'm looking forward to see the results.

Best,
 Oliver

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux