On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 13:14 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: > On 12/18/2007 01:09 PM, Lubomir Kundrak wrote: > > Oliver, > > > > On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:42 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426024 > >> > >> This is the second sa_restorer bug I filed. However. > >> > >> I can only ask all of you to check if your pkgs do use signal.h and if, > >> check if they do use sa_restorer. > >> > >> Maybe someone volunteers to do a grep over all sources!? And list the > >> pkgs here!? Someone already did a similar job after the introduction of > >> FORITIFY_SOURCE=2 with glibc's open check... I would do so myself, but I > >> don't have the ressources at the moment... > > > > I have complete rawhide source tree from 2007-11-14 exploded lying > > around. I'll assume it's recent enough and will post the results of the > > grep, but it takes some time as it's on a compressed filesystem. > > Great Lubomir! Thx. I'm looking forward to see the results. Here you are [1]. Just raw grep results, I hope it will help you find out where to look for sa_restorer occurences. [1] http://skosi.org/~lkundrak/misc/sa_restorer Regards, -- Lubomir Kundrak (Red Hat Security Response Team) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
