On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 02:14 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Andrew Farris <lordmorgul <at> gmail.com> writes: > > Text Editors', etc, for each and every place there is duplication. But for > > separation of the basic *GTK based* versus *QT based* applications a submenu > > would work nicely, see next comment. > > I think that's an absolutely terrible criterion to group things by. GTK+/GNOME > apps work fine under KDE, Qt/KDE apps work fine under GNOME. While for basic > tasks, there's usually both a KDE and a GNOME app (still I'd like the choice! > OnlyShowIn sucks!), for more advanced tasks there's often only one application, > and I think that's a good thing. It doesn't make sense to waste time rewriting > all applications in Qt/KDE for no reason other than "GNOME sucks" > (independently of whether that's true or not) or the opposite. So I think the > current "clutter" (as you call it), i.e. offering all applications in the same > menu, is the best solution. > > Kevin Kofler I'm just pitching the idea, but maybe it would be interesting to keep the applications listed under a single menu but sort by function as well. For example: --- Media Players --- <-- Dividers are grey Amarok Audacious Rhythmbox Totem VLC --- Authoring Tools --- Audacity Avidemux K3B Pitivi --- Sound Tools --- PulseAudio Device Chooser PulseAudio Manager PulseAudio Volume Meter --- Misc. --- ... One problem I can see already though is there would be a lot piling up under the Misc. section. Stewart -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
