It seems to get a redhat hangout here ^_^ About this stuff here.. about 50(?) posts ago someone of redhad said that it's not appropriate for a stable tree to include (possible) unstable alhpa/beta/rc software. Can't we just let it with that.. Don't make it a policy! just a suggested guideline? Also its said that a maintainer is free in his choice to include such software. that is a lot of power for a maintainer (?) which is fine with me but in the case of pushing up software that isn't in final and could be vital for fedora it might be handy that a redhat person looks at it before pushing it up. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list