Re: alpha/beta software in Fedora 8?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:12:37 +0100, Christopher Aillon scripst:
> Call it guidelines, suggestions, hints, policy, whatever.  That's all
> pedantry.

Yes, it is pedantry (what did you expect from me?), but it has some real 
life consequences -- Tom's long boring paragraph which no sane maintainer 
will ever read (I am afraid) is one example of trying to be too 
legalistic IMHO.

For hints text, something like this would be enough (again IMHO, and 
IAAL):

Maintainers should strongly avoid releasing "alpha" or "beta" builds of 
packages into Fedora (both Rawhide and especially into released 
distributions). If you think you need to do so, please, test thoroughly 
and write in the changelog the reasons why you did so (if possible with 
the timeline stable release could be expected).

or something of this kind.

Matěj

-- 
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: ceplma<at>jabber.cz
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB  25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
 
When you're happy that cut and paste actually works I think it's
a sign you've been using X-Windows for too long.
   -- from /. discussion on poor integration between KDE and
      GNOME

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux