On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 07:33 +0100, Christopher Aillon wrote: > On 11/28/2007 06:56 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>>> "TC" == Tom \"spot\" Callaway <Tom> writes: > > > > TC> Such as? Open to suggestions here. > > > > We had > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/MaintainerResponsibilityPolicy > > which was never finished; the only thing in there is "Maintain > > stability for users". I honestly don't see how you can be much more > > specific without introducing needless bureaucracy. After all, the > > alpha releases of some projects are more stable then the full releases > > of others. > > This seems pretty much perfect, actually. What does it need in order to > be "finished"? Well, I'm not sure how it can be considered perfect when it does not begin to address the "alpha/beta" issue that you think is resolvable with packaging policy. FWIW, I agree with Tibbs, since we have no way of determining how stable package releases are without trusting the maintainer. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
