On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:19:55 +0100 Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > OK, but please don't call it "policy" (which implicates at least for > this former lawyer a set of binding rules), but something like "Some > hints on finding out whether the upstream relase is good enough for > Fedora". I am afraid, that policy-wise we cannot make any better rule > for maintainers than "Don't be stupid" or something of this sort. I'm not really interested in playing word games. If you must, call it a Guideline to match our Packaging Guidelines. I don't want there to be 10 different terms for these things in our wiki. So far we have policy and guideline. Pick one of those to file this under, I don't care which. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
