Re: Maintainers Responsibility (was alpha/beta software in Fedora 8)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 09:43 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 11:31 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> 
> > The importance of individual packages is pretty dependent on the use
> > case. For most users of a Fedora desktop, it is probably far more
> > disastrous if the email client or web browser crashes, than if some dns
> > server the haven't installed has some bugs.
> 
> This assumes that Fedora is "just" a desktop, while it is much more --
> the desktop is "just" a part of it. A significant one, surely, but a
> part. From my POV, Adam was okay to put in that version of bind because
> he tested it and found no problems, and most definitely not because the
> bind package is somehow less important than say the gnome-panel.

Read Matthias' reply again. He made no such assumption, you did: "For
most users of a Fedora desktop [...]"

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux