On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 07:33 +0100, Christopher Aillon wrote: > On 11/28/2007 06:56 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > > > We had > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/MaintainerResponsibilityPolicy > > which was never finished; the only thing in there is "Maintain > > stability for users". I honestly don't see how you can be much more > > specific without introducing needless bureaucracy. After all, the > > alpha releases of some projects are more stable then the full releases > > of others. > > This seems pretty much perfect, actually. What does it need in order to > be "finished"? Really it's just looking for some feedback from the mailing lists. I started an e-mail on it before the holiday, just haven't had time to send it yet. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
