On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:21:35 +0100 Olivier Galibert <galibert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, I need Core back. Not Core as in "my package is holier than > yours", that we can do without, but core as in "all these packages > work well together, can all be installed together, and you will be > able to do mostly anything with them". Jesse Keating told last june > on the list, after yet another of my bitchings, that the "Fedora" > spin, aka the packages on the DVD, were supposed to replace that. The > F8 release shows it's not the case anymore. > > I'm not sure how technically and socially a core-like package > selection could be organized. Any experience in that area? A "core" is as good as the people testing it can make it. Modulo the multilib conflicts which is a problem of it's own, what issues do you have? I'm open for more discussion on what all should land on the DVD, note /discussion/, not demands. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
