On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:26:02 +0100 Christopher Aillon <caillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > While I was unable to attend at this time anyway, I am very much > annoyed at the lack of notice from a global perspective. It is not > unreasonable for someone to make a 9pm meeting. It *is* unreasonable > to expect someone to be reading mail during dinner hours to find out > about it. The reason that the meeting was rescheduled was because of > a U.S. specific holiday, and in the process, made it very difficult > for non-Americans that wanted to attend to do so. We didn't push > back because we deemed the topics of enough importance. Which > underscores the importance for giving people fair chances at > showing. Do we seriously need to institute a policy for a minimum > amount of notice with meeting schedule changes? Or can we start > thinking like a global distribution? There was a poll site set up for who could make what meeting times. A time was picked that had the most people available marked, and those people were specifically contacted again to make sure they could make it. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
