On 20.11.2007 13:49, Christopher Aillon wrote: > On 11/20/2007 08:56 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> BTW, does xulrunner properly and for real solve the problem? The current >> rawhide package just as firefox has a path with a version number in it >> (/usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9a9pre/) so I fear that there sill will be >> packages taht depend on a particular xulrunner version. Or is there some >> abstraction somewhere to make sure packages don't depend on a particular >> version of xulrunner? > Don't expect what's in rawhide right now to be what's in F9. We're > still working hard on getting things done right. This is on the list. > Even so, until the final release is made, xulrunner is still in a > pre-release stage and ABI is not yet guaranteed. k, thx for the clarification, as it looked a bit odd in its current state. CU knurd -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
