On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:43:05 +0100 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I stated when I started the SIG I didn't want the glorious leader > position, so I won't pretend I speak for it, and I'll only object for > the three affected packages I maintain or co-maintain. > > If this change is to be done I'll insist his author explain and defend > it on the SIG list, then write a formal FPC proposal, and get this > proposal approved all the way up. > > This is a "fix"¹ in search of a problem², and while I've been known to > make gratuitous changes to make a point too³, I've limited myself to > my own packages, and I'll appreciate the same restraint in my fellow > Fedorans. So it would seem we're /not/ in agreement on this point. Thorsten, are you trying to fix a real problem, or just trying to ensure everything follows a guideline regarding exit failures in %post scriptlets? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
