On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 10:24 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 10:18 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > Of course, the correct way to have scriptlets that don't fail is to > > write them in a way that doesn't fails, not the swipe the failure under > > the carpet... > > Yes, but fixing every possible application which could ever be put in a > scriplet to never, ever, ever fail, even in the cases when failure is > acceptable (and shouldn't kill the transaction) is a little beyond the > mandate of the FPC. ;) > If scriptlet are not allowed to ever, ever, fail, then just make rpm ignore the exit code of scriptlets. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
