Le vendredi 16 novembre 2007 à 13:36 -0500, Bill Nottingham a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > scriptlets should be allowed to fail when the failure is catastrophic > > > enough. What that is, I'm not sure. > > > > scriptlets should be allowed to fail when the benefits of failing > > (fixing packages) outweigh the cost of failure (killing transactions for > > lots of users). Since so far the only documented failure was in rawhide > > (at a time I doubt rawhide was perfectly installable anyway) I question > > the need to hide this particular failure. > > Not all scriptlets abort the transaction anyways, as I recall. %post > certainly doesn't. So, maybe it should just be %pre shouldn't fail. Well if this particular error never hit stable and never stayed long in rawhide that's because the failure is immediate the first time someone actually installs a faulty package, and "fixing" the scriptlet only increases the probability a problem package will hit stable Please keep this a brownpaper bag error. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
