Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > scriptlets should be allowed to fail when the failure is catastrophic > > enough. What that is, I'm not sure. > > scriptlets should be allowed to fail when the benefits of failing > (fixing packages) outweigh the cost of failure (killing transactions for > lots of users). Since so far the only documented failure was in rawhide > (at a time I doubt rawhide was perfectly installable anyway) I question > the need to hide this particular failure. Not all scriptlets abort the transaction anyways, as I recall. %post certainly doesn't. So, maybe it should just be %pre shouldn't fail. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
