Re: Codec Buddy misleading.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 19:48 +0100, Mark wrote:
> 2007/11/12, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Nov 12, 2007 9:34 AM, Mark <markg85@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I fully agree with that and hope that fedora is gonna put something
> > > like that in Codeina.
> >
> > How about... upstream put it in..and then Fedora or any other
> > distribution can make use of it?
> >
> > -jef
> 
> Than we would first need to find a way to make it even possible for
> other packages to add codec directives to codeina. I'm currently
> thinking that codeina should read the directory:
> /usr/share/codeina/xml where codeina should just read all the xml
> files. this can be a relative simple patch (if it's not done already..
> don't know) but i don't know if it's within the pm guidelines to add
> files insize the directory of another application
> (/usr/share/codeina/xml).. if that's no problem that this can be in
> quick. perhaps even i can make that patch..

This feature is already on the plans for F9, see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureCodecBuddy#head-5cb41960b4fbc6cef1d30689f536c1c0378d3484

Instructions on how to checkout the code are at the top of the page.
I'll be glad to receive your patch.

Cheers

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux