On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 07:31:56PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:50:43PM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > > I think you are the one missing the point Rui. > > Why would you say so... > > Because the cost of a lawsuit case is irrelevant > > > > Anyone can sue anyone for > > > anything - they are just likely to lose if they do something stupid. > > > > ... still you get to spend tens of thousands of Euros proving your > > innocence, as far as patent infringement goes. > > But I can accuse you of that whenever I like whether its true or not. So its > irrelevant to the discussion, its a totally specious argument. In any normal case, the accuser has to prove your guilt. But as far as I have understood about patents, you have to prove your innocence. I don't think it's an irrelevant or totally specious argument. Rui -- This statement is false. Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 22nd day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3173 + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
