Re: Codec Buddy misleading.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:35:32 -0500, Paul Wouters scripst:
>> For europe I think it is. It doesn't help for the Red Hat case because
>> as a US company Red Hat is obliged to obey US law.
> 
> Red Hat is also a German company. Those people could release a German
> version that includes it. Say in a German-only repository on german
> servers (and mirrors outside of red hat's control).

Don't go there -- you are trying to do an analysis of the venue for 
litigation in the international context. That's one of the most 
complicated things you can do in the international private law. I have 
two law degrees, one from U.S. university dealing explicitly with the 
international law, and still I wouldn't be very sure what the result of 
such analysis is. However, it is highly probable in my opinion (and I 
have been out of the legal practice for couple of years, so don't take 
this as a lawyer advice) that your suggested transaction structure would 
have no effect on the ability of American plaintiffs to sue Red Hat in 
USA.

Translated into plain English -- bad idea.

Best,

Matěj

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux