Re: Codec Buddy misleading.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 00:35 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > For europe I think it is. It doesn't help for the Red Hat case because
> > as a US company Red Hat is obliged to obey US law.
> 
> Red Hat is also a German company. Those people could release a German
> version that includes it. Say in a German-only repository on german
> servers (and mirrors outside of red hat's control).

Are you a lawyer? I don't think so. As I see it, if Red Hat Germany did
such a thing the U.S. based Red Hat Inc. would be equally liable before
U.S. courts as if it did it by itself.

Nils (not a lawyer as well)
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary
 Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."  --  B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux