Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:26:21 +0000 (UTC) > Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The way NetworkManager 0.7 has been handled in F8 makes me very >> distrustful of such "one backend, multiple frontend" solutions. > > The timeline of NetworkManager was /clearly/ communicated in multiple > FESCo meetings. Fact is, it was a last-minute thing, squeezed in late. We all know it. A mostly worthwhile thing, which is why FESCo was ok with it. And, btw, I agree with that decision ultimately.(1) But... please don't try to argue that this was something that the KDE SIG could have reasonably expected or planned for. Even if we had, I don't think upstream knetworkmanager could have sync'd to such a moving target that is nm-0.7 atm. -- Rex (1) Of course, 'twould have been *much* better to have introduced nm-0.7 much earlier in the release cycle, I think we can all agree to that. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
