On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 15:26:21 +0000 (UTC) Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And then what guarantees us the KDE frontend is not going to get the > same treatment KNetworkManager got for F8 (i.e. the backend getting > upgraded to an experimental, completely incompatible snapshot which > is not supported by the KDE frontend yet, and way too late in the > release cycle (after the feature freeze!) so there's no way the KDE > frontend can be fixed in time)? > > The way NetworkManager 0.7 has been handled in F8 makes me very > distrustful of such "one backend, multiple frontend" solutions. The timeline of NetworkManager was /clearly/ communicated in multiple FESCo meetings. I'm sorry if nobody from the KDE sig paid attention and sought out resources to work with NM developer to make sure the KDE side of things panned out. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
