/me got some download numbers from livna, so I'll send one final mail On 10.10.2007 23:17, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 23:02 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> /me will keep away from this thread now -- this won't lead to anything >> anyway; I'll tag it in the growing categories "Fedora knows better >> then >> me want I want" and "why Fedora never will become a true community >> distribution" > DaveJ doesn't want the bugreports. Are you volunteering to take them? Sure. > There are two ntfs implementations. One is old, crufted, and poorly > maintained. The other one is actively maintained, with lots of new > releases, bugfixes, and performance improvements. Nevertheless there are about 4500 F7 users installed kmod-ntfs from livna. I'd assume they didn't do that by accident. And I'd further assume most howtos these days will describe ntfs-3g, so I bet a good percentage of those 4500 chose the older one for a reason. > Which one should Fedora put forward for users, who don't know better? > Both? Sure -- just make ntfs-3g the default. Then normal users are happy and those that want the old stuff can use it easily. CU knurd -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
