On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 23:02 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > /me will keep away from this thread now -- this won't lead to anything > anyway; I'll tag it in the growing categories "Fedora knows better > then > me want I want" and "why Fedora never will become a true community > distribution" DaveJ doesn't want the bugreports. Are you volunteering to take them? There are two ntfs implementations. One is old, crufted, and poorly maintained. The other one is actively maintained, with lots of new releases, bugfixes, and performance improvements. Which one should Fedora put forward for users, who don't know better? Both? Dave asked me for my opinion, and I said that we shouldn't ship something that's not recommended by one of its authors, and has no real maintenance upstream: http://ntfs-3g.org/about.html IMHO, this the same reason we don't enable every possible module in the kernel. Feel free to plead your case to Dave Jones if you'd like. ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
