-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:13:05 -0600 Richi Plana <myfedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 14:09 +0200, Alexander Boström wrote: > > fre 2007-09-28 klockan 12:41 +0200 skrev Benny Amorsen: > > > > > There's no reason to have the spurious lib there. > > > > The reasoning behind /srv/lib is that it's relatively unlikely to > > already be in use and it is similar in purpose and look to /usr/lib > > and /var/lib. Remember, you're adding structure to a directory that > > has previously been marked as open territory. Thread lightly. > > "lib" does not make any sense. It didn't for /var/lib/(www| > mysql|<whatever>) and it certainly doesn't for /srv. Agreed. After all "lib" is short for "library", is it not? What does "library" have to do with, well, anything that's currently found under the /var/lib/ directory? > If collision avoidance is what you're interested in, name > it /srv/fedora[(-services)]/<packagename> or something. Personally, > I'm fine with anything. The sanity that administering and maintaining > systems that moving data to /srv brings is enough to satisfy me. > > As for ensuring that all the data that needs long-term storage be > moved from /var: I don't see how that could be hard, but it will be a > long, drawn-out process. Definitely worth the effort, though. Right. - -- Lamont Peterson <lamont@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Senior Instructor Guru Labs, L.C. [ http://www.GuruLabs.com/ ] NOTE: All messages from this email address should be digitally signed with my 0xDC0DD409 GPG key. It is available on the pgp.mit.edu keyserver as well as other keyservers that sync with MIT's. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG/X7y+YBsl9wN1AkRAjIpAKCZSkVkOJaOJvwpeC982V38ie5OrACffdsf wrC8RVPMcVd7crUJeSlhhvU= =Rj74 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
