On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 14:09 +0200, Alexander Boström wrote: > fre 2007-09-28 klockan 12:41 +0200 skrev Benny Amorsen: > > > There's no reason to have the spurious lib there. > > The reasoning behind /srv/lib is that it's relatively unlikely to > already be in use and it is similar in purpose and look to /usr/lib > and /var/lib. Remember, you're adding structure to a directory that has > previously been marked as open territory. Thread lightly. "lib" does not make any sense. It didn't for /var/lib/(www| mysql|<whatever>) and it certainly doesn't for /srv. If collision avoidance is what you're interested in, name it /srv/fedora[(-services)]/<packagename> or something. Personally, I'm fine with anything. The sanity that administering and maintaining systems that moving data to /srv brings is enough to satisfy me. As for ensuring that all the data that needs long-term storage be moved from /var: I don't see how that could be hard, but it will be a long, drawn-out process. Definitely worth the effort, though. -- Richi Plana -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
