On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:25:51AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:20:09 +0000 > "J??hann B. Gu??mundsson" <johannbg@xxxxx> wrote: > > > Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:57:08 +0000 > > > ""J??hann B. Gu??mundsson"" <johannbg@xxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> With strictly the media support ( ugly-plugins etc. ) and the > > >> rpmfusion repo installed, > > >> and excluding AMD and Nvidia drivers > > >> will we need Rename the spin or could it be released under Fedora name > > >> and artwork? * Legal/others > > >> > > > > > > No. You are including content that is not in Fedora, therefor you > > > cannot use the Fedora trademark and cannot use the trademarked logos. > > > You would have some renaming work ahead of you. > > > > > > > > I guessed so.. and replacing the artwork as well right? > > Yes. With the exception of the trademarked logos, the rest of the artwork is licensed to be reused, so it need not all be replaced. > > > But would I still be allowed to update and use Fedora repos right? > > You could have the spin pull from the Fedora repos for things, yes. > > > As in how deep would I need to go in renaming things? > > Removing every image containing the Fedora logo and every instance of > > the word Fedora. > > Repackage? > > I'm not sure but it wouldn't be trivial. There's work underway to make the fedora-logos package replaceable exactly so this task becomes trivial. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
