On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 14:27 -0400, Thomas J. Baker wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 12:12 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 11:57 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:06:41 -0400
> > > Matthew Saltzman <mjs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does that mean the workaround is to rpm -e xulrunner?
> > >
> > > Yes, if you happened to force the installation of xulrunner on the one
> > > day it showed up (with it's broken deps), you need to remove it
> > > manually.
> >
> > I don't recall forcing anything--it just showed up.
> >
> > That does fix the Firefox dep, but I still have the other problem: the
> > setroubleshoot update wants selinux-policy-base, which doesn't exist
> > AFAIK.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> I saw the same thing when updating with pup a few days back. It
> complained about not having the correct version of selinux (along with
> another dependency problem). I hit OK, unselected the other problematic
> rpm, then hit update again and it went through the update fine. It
> happened on all three of my F8T2 systems (two x86_64, one i386). This
> could be a pup bug but generating the conditions to make it occur again
> could be difficult.
I have the latest selinux, AFAIK (selinux-policy-3.0.8-11.fc8 and the
targeted one, and libselinux-2.0.34-3.fc8 and relatives). Still won't
update setroubleshoot to 0:1.10.5-1.fc8. Same problem with command-line
yum:
Missing dependency: selinux-policy-base >= 3.0.7-10 is needed by
package setroubleshoot.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tjb
--
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
