On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 12:12 -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 11:57 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:06:41 -0400 > > Matthew Saltzman <mjs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Does that mean the workaround is to rpm -e xulrunner? > > > > Yes, if you happened to force the installation of xulrunner on the one > > day it showed up (with it's broken deps), you need to remove it > > manually. > > I don't recall forcing anything--it just showed up. > > That does fix the Firefox dep, but I still have the other problem: the > setroubleshoot update wants selinux-policy-base, which doesn't exist > AFAIK. > > Thanks. > I saw the same thing when updating with pup a few days back. It complained about not having the correct version of selinux (along with another dependency problem). I hit OK, unselected the other problematic rpm, then hit update again and it went through the update fine. It happened on all three of my F8T2 systems (two x86_64, one i386). This could be a pup bug but generating the conditions to make it occur again could be difficult. Thanks, tjb -- ======================================================================= | Thomas Baker email: tjb@xxxxxxx | | Systems Programmer | | Research Computing Center voice: (603) 862-4490 | | University of New Hampshire fax: (603) 862-1761 | | 332 Morse Hall | | Durham, NH 03824 USA http://wintermute.sr.unh.edu/~tjb | ======================================================================= -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
