Στις 12-09-2007, ημέρα Τετ, και ώρα 15:43 +0200, ο/η nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx έγραψε: > > De : "Jeremy Katz" <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Actually, nothing says that additional repos can't have their own > > specspo-type package as well. > > This is considerably upping the bar to creation of a new repository, > and making impossible the common "collect rpms, launch createrepo" > workflow Is it that bad really? It's a step that could be done by a script and have the POs hosted at the repo's own VCS, reached by transifex. > > All of the above said, specspo probably _isn't_ the > > right answer... > > Yes, it was hyped as necessary to make translator work easy, and now > you have translators complaining of it. Is there a way to have these PO files cut into more "logical" pieces? Translators for example would like to work incrementally from the most to the less important ones. Or, have a PO with packages that will (most likely) show up in the main screens of pirut, etc. Maybe specspo is a good opportunity to start thinking about installing a pootle server. If the strings don't change very often, the maintenance cost (merging, etc) could be bearable. -d -- Dimitris Glezos Jabber ID: glezos@xxxxxxxxxx, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B http://dimitris.glezos.com/ "He who gives up functionality for ease of use loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous) -- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
