Re: desc and summary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Sam 22 septembre 2007 19:50, Dimitris Glezos a écrit :
> Στις 12-09-2007, ημέρα Τετ, και ώρα 15:43 +0200, ο/η
> nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx έγραψε:
>> > De : "Jeremy Katz" <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> > Actually, nothing says that additional repos can't have their own
>> > specspo-type package as well.
>>
>> This is considerably upping the bar to creation of a new repository,
>> and making impossible the common "collect rpms, launch createrepo"
>> workflow
>
> Is it that bad really? It's a step that could be done by a script and
> have the POs hosted at the repo's own VCS, reached by transifex.

Small local or third-party repositories have almost no infrastructure,
they manage bunches of rpm and nothing else, so if translations are
not embedded in the packages themselves (in the spec of in a detached
file inside the srpm) they get lost.

You'll note that Fedora is no different, we do not require a working
yum repo for new package submissions, just a srpm somewhere on the net

Regards

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux