Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:37:23 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:53:59 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
yum --exclude=xulrunner update works.
Yum doesn't want xulrunner.
Sure it does. See my earlier reply.
Not sure which one you are referring to.
One in this thread.
Didn't get any other mails from you in this thread.
I understand X wants Y to
specific a direct or indirect dependency which is not the case here. Yum
is merely indicating a repository issue in this instance.
A "repository issue" because it attempted at replacing firefox with
xulrunner. Which is because "yum wants xulrunner" in the update
transaction set.
Right. As Jesse Keating, we are merely reading things differently.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
