On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:37:23 +0530 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Not sure which one you are referring to. I understand X wants Y to > specific a direct or indirect dependency which is not the case here. > Yum is merely indicating a repository issue in this instance. Ok, shame on me for giving you the benefit of the doubt. Yum update transactions /will/ in fact bring xulrunner into the transaction set. You could verify this yourself if you tried. Apologies to Michael. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
