Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:37:23 +0530
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not sure which one you are referring to. I understand X wants Y to
specific a direct or indirect dependency which is not the case here.
Yum is merely indicating a repository issue in this instance.
Ok, shame on me for giving you the benefit of the doubt. Yum update
transactions /will/ in fact bring xulrunner into the transaction set.
You could verify this yourself if you tried. Apologies to Michael.
You were correct. I was referring to direct/indirect dependencies to yum
itself and not update transactions.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
