On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:37:23 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:53:59 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > >>> yum --exclude=xulrunner update works. > >> Yum doesn't want xulrunner. > > > > Sure it does. See my earlier reply. > > Not sure which one you are referring to. One in this thread. > I understand X wants Y to > specific a direct or indirect dependency which is not the case here. Yum > is merely indicating a repository issue in this instance. A "repository issue" because it attempted at replacing firefox with xulrunner. Which is because "yum wants xulrunner" in the update transaction set. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
