On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 14:13 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams (ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 12:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Most of the python config tools (system-config-*, anaconda) include > > > their own copies of bluecurve icons. It makes sense to me that they > > > should use system icons whenever possible, to match the current theme. > > > > +1 to making it match/use the current theme, but -1 to using generic > > system icons. > > > > Pulling the individual icons out of the packages and into redhat-artwork > > (or perhaps system-config-artwork?) is fine, but I still think the > > distinctiveness of their icons versus the generic control panel icons is > > a good thing. > > The problem is that doesn't actually help - you'd need to do a version > of the icon for each theme, which is something I'd like to avoid. > > Right now, you boot up a *stock* desktop, and you have the gnome icons > (in the GNOME style), the config tool icons (in the bluecurve style), > and the puplet icons (in the echo style). That's *ugly*. A lot of these tools have larger interface issues than non-matching icons, though... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
