Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams (ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx) said: > On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 12:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Most of the python config tools (system-config-*, anaconda) include > > their own copies of bluecurve icons. It makes sense to me that they > > should use system icons whenever possible, to match the current theme. > > +1 to making it match/use the current theme, but -1 to using generic > system icons. > > Pulling the individual icons out of the packages and into redhat-artwork > (or perhaps system-config-artwork?) is fine, but I still think the > distinctiveness of their icons versus the generic control panel icons is > a good thing. The problem is that doesn't actually help - you'd need to do a version of the icon for each theme, which is something I'd like to avoid. Right now, you boot up a *stock* desktop, and you have the gnome icons (in the GNOME style), the config tool icons (in the bluecurve style), and the puplet icons (in the echo style). That's *ugly*. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
