On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 22:58 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le mercredi 12 septembre 2007 à 21:42 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > > Le mercredi 12 septembre 2007 à 08:17 -0800, Jeff Spaleta a écrit : > > > On 9/12/07, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Or, if you need another level of indirection, include a repo that > > > > doesn't itself have anything controversial but has a package that > > > > configures yum for repos that might. > > > > > > oh classy. So how would that work from a user perspective? > > > > I hope yum has a check somewhere to forbid installation of unknown > > default-on repositories. > > There is a difference between trusting a repo and trusting it to > authorize other repos > trusting the repo to have packagers who won't do that stuff. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list