Le mercredi 12 septembre 2007 à 21:42 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > Le mercredi 12 septembre 2007 à 08:17 -0800, Jeff Spaleta a écrit : > > On 9/12/07, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Or, if you need another level of indirection, include a repo that > > > doesn't itself have anything controversial but has a package that > > > configures yum for repos that might. > > > > oh classy. So how would that work from a user perspective? > > I hope yum has a check somewhere to forbid installation of unknown > default-on repositories. There is a difference between trusting a repo and trusting it to authorize other repos -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list