Re: Goal: Increased Modularity?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le jeudi 06 septembre 2007 à 08:15 -0500, Les Mikesell a écrit :

> That seems philosophically very wrong.

...

> That's not supposed to be the case.

...

>  It's just annoying that the 
> packaged location is different from what Sun uses

...

> and Sun should be somewhat of an authority on matters pertaining to java

1. You're welcome to found a better designed Java packaging project.

2. SUN didn't care at all about the Java deployment problem space till
it got sidelined by .Net and OSGi/Eclipse on the other. SUN's solution
to the problem is JSR 277, which won't be deployed anywhere before Java
7 (mid-2008 at the earliest) and it remains to be seen if it will fly,
crash or be rpm-compatible.

> - and even more annoying that in this long chain of questions I still 
> don't have the simple answer

You were given information but chose not to listen. I won't waste any
more time on the subject.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux