Le Jeu 6 septembre 2007 08:57, Les Mikesell a écrit : > How can that be > if you don't keep track of the JVMs themselves? Or if the packages are > supposed to be usable with unpackaged JVMs? They are *not* supposed to be usable with unpackaged JVMs. Sorry. JPP won't maintain a huge pile of workarounds just because vendors are too lazy to follow common conventions and stick to them. Sometimes people release an adaptation layer for a specific vendor jvm and yes this layer is specific to this jvm but that's about it. > I don't particularly care how the files are managed or where they > live. Then you won't ever understand why something works or not and how to fix your problems. The default is "just use the system jvm" if you don't want to follow the defaults you have to understand the conventions. That means reading the docs not deciding beforehand what's relevant and what's not. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
