Re: Goal: Increased Modularity?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 11:12 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I want to know the correct JAVA_HOME and PATH settings for all the 
> possible JVMs when they are installed as alternatives-conforming RPM 
> packages but are not the system default.  Is this documented somewhere?

It seems the current convention is to put the JAVA packages
under /usr/lib/jvm/(java|jre)-<majversion>-<vendor>-<majminversion> with
certain packages going to /usr/lib/jvm-exports/
and /usr/lib/jvm-private/

Who's convention is this, anyway? And what's it called? It seems Fedora
and jpackage both honor this convention (and alternatives uses it. Or
maybe it's the other way around ... this convention uses was designed
around alternatives).

Just my guesses.
--

Richi Plana

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux