On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 09:29:22AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > The problem is not the R name, the problem is the useful parts of the > LSB spec are in a package that pulls a lot of garbage, instead of > being in a separate package people can require independently. My comments were not about whether a LSB dependency is good or bad, but about how to name this dependency *if* we move to using LSB. -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
