Re: /lib/lsb/init-functions vs. /etc/init.d/functions in init scripts?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 06:37:14PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:

> Does one have to require redhat-lsb in your RPM spec file?

Aside from Jeremy's response, I would suggest then to require "lsb",
or (whatever's applicable) some variant with/without a version number
(e.g., "lsb-core-noarch >= 3.1"), which is already "provided" by
redhat-lsb, so that the dependency is not about the specific package
name, that could also have been fedora-lsb, or something else.

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux