On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 06:37:14PM -0400, John Dennis wrote: > Does one have to require redhat-lsb in your RPM spec file? Aside from Jeremy's response, I would suggest then to require "lsb", or (whatever's applicable) some variant with/without a version number (e.g., "lsb-core-noarch >= 3.1"), which is already "provided" by redhat-lsb, so that the dependency is not about the specific package name, that could also have been fedora-lsb, or something else. -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
