Le Mar 28 août 2007 07:55, Jos Vos a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 06:37:14PM -0400, John Dennis wrote: > >> Does one have to require redhat-lsb in your RPM spec file? > > Aside from Jeremy's response, I would suggest then to require "lsb", > or (whatever's applicable) some variant with/without a version number > (e.g., "lsb-core-noarch >= 3.1"), which is already "provided" by > redhat-lsb, so that the dependency is not about the specific package > name, that could also have been fedora-lsb, or something else. The problem is not the R name, the problem is the useful parts of the LSB spec are in a package that pulls a lot of garbage, instead of being in a separate package people can require independently. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
